English Literature Quiz - DNA - Understanding the Text (Answers)
This GCSE English Literature quiz takes a look at Dennis Kelly's DNA. In order to be able to write about a text, you’ll first need to make sure you understand it. “Comprehension” is often discussed as if it is the easiest of literary tasks to master, but it is trickier than it seems. If texts only had a single simple meaning, authors would not write entire books to convey the message.
DNA is a short play with relatively few characters, written in four brief acts. The content of the play is brutally straightforward.
[readmore]One group of teenagers is responsible for the death of a peer and decides to deflect any suspicion away from themselves by inventing a suspect. While the events are simple to describe, the play deals with relationships between individuals and groups, as well as the existence of groups within wider society. It is in this area that the play becomes much more complex.
Authors use a variety of methods to convey meaning. Authors might well state their meaning directly, but it is more typical for an author to communicate through other aspects of fiction, such as character, setting, plot, theme and dialogue. Focussing on each of these elements will help to increase your understanding of the text. If you have time, try to re-read the text, too. When you read a book only once, you are very likely to miss important details. If you find that you need to read certain sections several times in order to understand them, don’t worry! Noticing that you haven’t fully understood a section means that you are paying close attention to the complex nature of the text.
Making a timeline of events is a practical approach to revision. Draw up a list of acts and scenes, noting the key events which happen in each. Think about how each of these relates to plot development overall.
Consider the relationship between characters’ actions and motivations. Can you find reasons for the ways in which individual characters behave? What clues exist in the text? Are there trustworthy characters, whose words can be taken at face value? As you think about the text, consider how you might justify your views through evidence.
Remember to pay especially close attention to the beginnings and ends of the text. Why might the author have begun the text a certain way? What does the setting for each scene tell the reader? What do we know, or learn, about each character – and how? By devoting some attention to careful and detailed analysis of this sort, you can greatly improve your understanding of the text.
Read the questions below on DNA and test your knowledge and understanding of the text.
[/readmore]
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
After quizzing Mark on whether he's talking about the "living dead", whether there has been a mistake, it's all a joke, or if Adam can be hiding, Jan asks, "what are we going to do?" How the group responds to the terrible event which takes place before the beginning of the play is its central problem
|
The group talk about the way in which they abused Adam, beginning with the smaller acts of bullying, insisting that Adam was enjoying the joke, and ending with the moment they begin to throw stones at him as he walks over the grille. The horrifying nature of their recount draws power from the slow buildup to this moment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The recount of events shows how differently each person reacts, with even John Tate eventually accepting reality by using the word "dead" himself
|
Jan and Mark hint that Adam was willing to go along with the "joking" because he so desperately wanted to join the group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phil has a response ready instantly when John Tate asks him what they should all do. His plan involves collecting DNA from an innocent man
|
Phil tells the three that they must place the jumper in the bag without touching it. He plans the operation carefully so that no traces lead back to the group of young people actually responsible for Adam's disappearance
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian was first ordered to tell the head that a stranger had exposed himself in the woods. When the blame has been pinned on a real person, Brian at first refuses to go to the police station to identify him; he is coerced into going when Phil threatens to give him the same treatment as Adam
|
The authorities, including the police, will not only discover that the group believed they had killed Adam, but also that they hadn't tried to save him or get help for him, had remained silent after his disappearance and framed someone for his murder
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leah discusses herself, the state of the world, the people they both know, philosophical matters and other topics with which she occupies her thoughts, while Phil remains silent. She tries to provoke a reaction from him, but does not succeed
|
Richard, like Leah, cannot get any type of reaction from Phil. In the face of Phil's silence, Richard, like Leah, begins to speak philosophically, wondering about the universe and the meaning of life
|